June 22, 2008

George Carlin

George Carlin (1937-2008)

I cannot believe he’s gone. I cannot believe how much I miss him. I still remember this gem of his. Last time I heard it was over 30 years ago. Sing along, will you?


Oh, beautiful, for smoggy skies,
Insecticided grains;
For strip-mined mountains majesty,
Above the asphalt plains;
America, America, man sheds his waste on thee;
And hides thy pines with billboard signs,
From sea to oily sea!


Judith Hayes

June 1, 2008

Virgins and Whores

There is a delightful, inspirational story in the Bible about a man, his wife and their two daughters. From very humble beginnings, the man not only moved up in the world, step by step, but those steps rapidly turned into giant strides, making him a most respected and influential member of society. He married a beautiful woman whom he loved dearly, and when their daughters arrived they were loved unreservedly. If you want some uplifting reading, I can’t recommend this narrative strongly enough. You’ll find it in . . . .

Oops. I currently have five books all opened on my small desk here, and it seems I have mixed them up. Sorry about that. The inspirational story is about Barack and Michelle Obama. Unfortunately, you won’t find any lovely stories about women in the Bible. In the Bible, females are one of three things—a virgin, a whore or somebody’s wife and as a wife you are property meant only to bear sons for your husband. Kinda like cows produce milk. Concubines were bought and paid for, like wives, but they could not inherit so they were just, well, status symbols and property.

It would appear, from reading the Old Testament, that the most important attribute a female can possess is a hymen. The Holy Hymen. Don’t believe it? Read Deuteronomy, Chapter 22. It is astonishing in its breadth of hymen worship and its obsession with sex. That one chapter covers all of the following, and it’s only 894 words long:

1. Cross-dressing is an abomination.
2. If a man marries a woman, has sex with her, then discovers he hates her, and tries to get out of the deal by claiming she was not a virgin, the bride’s parents shall present to the elders of the city the “tokens of the damsel’s virginity” (meaning a blood-stained bed-sheet) and the husband shall be fined for his lying. The hated wife can not be got rid of by the hating husband, ever. 
3. However, if bloody sheets cannot be produced, then the “damsel” shall be brought to her father’s house and stoned to death.
4. If a man sleeps with another man’s wife, both parties, the sinful man and the sinful woman, shall die. The sinful man has defiled another man’s property, so they both have to go, the man and the property.
5. If, in the city, a man rapes a virgin who is betrothed, they are both to be stoned to death. After all, if she’s in the city, and failed to cry out loud enough to stop the rape, then she and her rapist both die.
6. However, if a rapist does his deed to a betrothed female “in the field” then only he dies. The damsel may have cried out, but no one could have heard her to stop it. So only he dies.
7. If a man finds a virginal damsel who is not betrothed, and rapes her, then the rapist shall pay the female’s father fifty shekels of silver (for damaging the father’s property) and the female becomes the wife of her rapist. Forever.
8. Finally, a man may not sleep with any of his father’s wives. He also may not sleep with his father.

This is one sex-drenched chapter! The verses quoted most often, and for good reason, are these: “But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel: Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father's house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you.” (Deut 22:20-21) That pretty well sums up the Bible’s opinion of women. Females had best be the bearers of hymens. Nothing else matters.

What is so obviously ignored in these ignorant words is that for every sinful “damsel” there is a man who made her that way. One of those “men of her city” stoning the hymen-less bride was probably the one who relieved her of her hymen. This sounds like a bit of feminist petulance, but it is more than that. The whole stoning thing is just stupid. If half the world can treat the other half as property, then both halves lose. Consider slavery. Or South Africa’s apartheid. Or Rush Limbaugh’s tirades. Humanity does not benefit from any of these bigots or bigotry. The fact that Deuteronomy’s misogyny is so blatant makes Christians and Jews wince and want to look away. But they may not look away. Why? Well, people like me won’t let them. If you consider yourself a Christian or  Jew, and the Bible is the word of God, you must accept all of the above hateful nonsense as God’s will. Ouch. Not fun, huh?

To this day in Orthodox synagogues women are not allowed to be seated with the men. Often they must sit behind a screen as if they had cooties. Apologists be damned, the minyan still exists.  A minyan is the Jewish requirement of a minimum of ten men in order to engage in certain religious activities. In Orthodox Judaism it is an absolute. Other Jewish strands will now also allow women in a minyan. Yet I’m finding it difficult to get choked up about that sort of generosity.

And of course let’s not forget the Muslims. Properly observant Muslims follow the time-honored practice of hijab. And just what is hijab? Simply put, it means that women are forced to dress like beekeepers. It would be funny except it isn’t. A large percentage of Muslim countries, following Islamic law, force this dress code on their women. Why? According to the Koran, “O Prophet! Tell thy wives and  daughters, and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons...that they should be known and not molested.” [Chapter 33, verse 59]

Cast their outer garments…yeah, we’re talking beekeepers. Proper hijab means a woman must cover her entire body except for her hands and her face. Her tent-like drape must not reveal even a hint of her shape. Her hair must not be visible at all. Those unfortunate enough to have some unwanted facial hair can solve the problem by opting for the Super Deluxe Tent, which reveals no face at all, and vision is only possible through a square of netting material in front of the eyes. Stepping off a curb can be a treacherous undertaking in one of these, but let’s keep our priorities straight. Hijab first, broken ankles second. Colors are to be drab so as not to attract attention. Jewelry is forbidden, especially noisy jewelry such as ankle-bracelets with bells. Ankle-bracelets with bells? We used to bell our cat because otherwise she’d sneak up on us and scare the daylights out of us but she didn’t seem to mind the bell. (ASPCA-approved.) But ankle-bracelets? I can’t imagine doing a Jingle Bells routine with each step and I think it would drive me crazy. But I digress. That part of hijab makes sense. No jingling.

Make-up and perfume are strictly prohibited, although in all that desert heat, wearing those tents, you have to wonder about body odor. Poor dears. Hopefully they’re allowed some fragrance-free herbs or something. However, as silly as this all sounds, it is a purely political power move. And a successful one. How can any young girl even begin to develop self-esteem, and therefore, possibly, independence, when she’s taught that her body is a ticking time-bomb? Answer: she can’t. And that’s the whole point.

The Uncontrollable, Unruly Penis Problem

What all the above examples are saying is that males have no power over their penises. Men claim that men should rule the world (women are too emotional) even though men can’t rule their own penises. Hmmm. What is wrong with this premise? Penises have wills of their own, don’t they? Men can’t control them! It would be nice to think that men could control their actions, but apparently that’s not an option. So they blame women for getting them all riled up.


This poor Muslim woman, was accused of adultery, and is being buried up to her waist in preparation of being stoned to death. Why is she being buried? It is so that while she is being stoned to death none of her “private parts” might be exposed. So logical. God forbid a woman’s pubic hair (or worse!) be exposed while she’s dying! Stonings like this still occur. The stoning of women is practiced in Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Nigeria and Saudi Arabia. Allah be praised.

Show a man your ankle and you’re asking to be raped! Everyone knows that. And if your ankles are playing Jingle Bells….okay, we’ve had enough of that.  But the idea that women are seductive temptresses, motivated to drive men insane with sexual passion is, not surprisingly, a male idea. Women, like all sensible humans, want to be comfortable when they dress. They want to dress to accommodate ease of movement and, of course, the weather. They also have the additional problem of carrying babies and toddlers, so that would logically fit into their wardrobe decisions.

Also to be considered in this clothing discussion is the equator. People live there. I don’t know how they can stand the heat but they have managed. And the women’s clothes? Many cultures fight the heat with light clothing while others wear almost nothing at all. In all cases there is no problem with males being driven mad by women’s bodies and raping till they drop. Any restrictions, anywhere, on female clothes and/or behavior are strictly part of a political power play, to keep women in their place, subordinate to men. To prove this, consider the most famous women in the Bible. Let’s begin at the beginning, with Eve.

Biblical Bitches

Eve didn’t know she was naked, so I think we’re talking airhead here. Of course we have no way of knowing if a chimpanzee knows he’s naked, until we put little suits on him and set him on a tricycle. But I digress. Adam and Eve were told by God not to eat the fruit of a certain tree. Why the tree was there in the first place is a subject for a three-volume tome and another time. For our purposes, though, consider that it was the woman, Eve, who was talked into eating the forbidden fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil (don’t ask) and she was convinced to do it by a talking snake (don’t ask). She then convinced Adam to try the fruit too. And he did. Because of that, they both suddenly realized they were naked and humankind was forever after doomed to pain and misery. So we have two people sinning and only one blamed: Eve! From that point on her husband was to rule over her. But why? What of Adam’s sin? Could he not have said no to Eve? I think we’re talking about the penis problem again because apparently he was unable to utter the simple word, “No.”

Also in the Bible’s Book of Genesis, we have the well known story of Sodom and Gomorrah. The people living there were beyond evil. They did things with leather and pussy willows that the modern mind can barely comprehend. They had to go. So God warned the only worthwhile human in the area, Lot, that the cities were about to be destroyed, so Lot should leave town pronto, but he should not look back at the cities being bombarded with fire and brimstone. (We may assume the fire and brimstone also murdered the babies and children, but that thought is for another time.) Anyway, Lot did as he was told and left town, but while doing so his wife, who is so important in the morality lesson, but so unimportant she had no name, did turn and look back. Stupid, stupid woman. Well, for her efforts, this woman-with-no-name was turned into a pillar of salt. Right there on the spot. A pillar of salt. And just because she turned around. Maybe she felt a huge mosquito on her shoulder? Well, we’ll never know, but the point remains. The female screwed up yet again.

Then we move on to one of the most famous bitches of all—Delilah. Tom Jones sang a song about her. Delilah’s story is long and complicated so let’s cut a long story short. Delilah was a traitor who sold out the famous Samson to the Philistines. How? By cutting off his hair. I am not making this up. His world-renowned strength resided in his hair. I wonder if he used mousse and gel. Anyway, once again a dastardly deed is laid at the feet, or whatever, of a female. This is getting tiresome.

Wedged in here is Jael Heber's wife. She destroyed an enemy named Sisera. She “took a nail of the tent, and took an hammer in her hand, and went softly unto him, and smote the nail into his temples, and fastened it into the ground: for he was fast asleep and weary. So he died. [Duh.] (Judg 4:21)

And now, we come to perhaps the most famous biblical bitch of all—Jezebel. Everyone knows that name. It is synonymous with evil and seductive and temptress. It has become a common noun. It refers to any woman who is evil and scheming. Jezebel’s story? Well, actually, it is a his story because a previously faithful Ahab married this Jezebel person and began worshipping a false god, Baal. I think we’re back to the penis problem again. Anyway, for her sins, Jezebel was treated thusly: “And the dogs shall eat Jezebel in the portion of Jezreel, and there shall be none to bury her.” (II Ki 9:10) Well, yuck. To this day women who “steal” husbands are called home-wreckers and/or “Jezebels.” Note to all: You can steal a wide-screen TV, or a pirated copy of Photoshop, but husbands leave their “happy” homes quite willingly, usually with very happy penises. Don’t blame Jezebel.

The Two Marys

They are the most famous Marys in the Bible. One, The Virgin Mary, who gave birth to Jesus, (and managed to do that while keeping an intact hymen…don’t ask) and Mary Magdalene, the purported prostitute. Was she though? Not even biblical scholars agree. But ask anyone on the street if they think Mary Magdalene was a hooker and nine of ten will say yes.  

 But the point remains. Women come in two versions, according to religion: virgins and whores. So simple. So stupid.

And Now for Something Completely Different

Okay. So much for religious morality. New thought: What if atheists ruled the world? What an alien concept! But it is simplicity itself. You know how complicated the atheistic dress code would be? Be comfortable and wear the correct SPF in the sun if you’re worried about skin cancer. Be comfortable and practical. Think you could live with that? No penalties, no threats, no dire warnings about male erections or jingling ankles.
As for behavior, Confucius got it right long before Jesus: “Don’t do to others anything you wouldn’t want done to yourself.” That is a more powerful injunction than “do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” And long before that, mammals who wanted to survive had to get along with each other. Simple as that. If they killed each other at the drop of a hat, they would go extinct in a heartbeat. Get along or disappear. But it doesn’t take a frightening, threatening God to make these beings behave. Mother Nature does it all.
Why religions have to portray females as virgins or whores must be explained by men. So, gentlemen, I’m listening.

Hell on Earth

Years ago a Florida newspaper ran a feature in its “Life” section (read: irony) titled, “Visions of hell.” It ran exactly two weeks after Easter, which may or may not have been a snide reminder of what awaits those of us who foolishly fail to heed God’s warnings.

The only problem is that no one could agree on exactly what Hell is. (Now there’s a surprise.) There are many detailed descriptions available, of course, but they are all contradictory and therefore mutually exclusive. This poses the usual problem, which by now has become my theme song. Well, anyway, okay. Let’s say that there is a Hell. Fine. But which one?

(I am choosing to use the upper case for “Hell,” just as you would for any other proper name for a “place.” Like Washington, D. C.)

According to the seven religious leaders quoted in the newspaper article, Hell can be a place where you are simply separated from God, a supposedly horrible fate, or it can be a place of unbelievable agony. For example, it is said to be a place where your skin will be boiled off, only to grow back again so that it can be boiled off again. This goes on for all eternity. Or it is a place where you will have a hot metal stake pierced through your tongue. Or you will freeze to death (aren’t you already dead?) then thaw, then freeze again, over and over. Or Hell is just a place of darkness, flames and screaming—your basic, no-frills Hell. Or Hell is merely symbolic, not actually being a place. Or, finally, Hell doesn’t exist at all.

The Muslim Hell (boiling, freezing, tongue-piercing) seems most unappealing, a very nasty place all the way around. And apparently the Prophet Muhammad’s vision of Hell included more women than men. Why? Because the women had been ungrateful to their husbands. This makes sense since Islamic women have been notoriously ungrateful for having their genitalia sliced off and/or sewn shut, and for being bartered like beads in a bazaar, and for being forced into harems. They pretty much define ingratitude, and Hell seems eminently fair here.

The Catholic Hell sounds more generic, with general torment meted out more or less evenly in the form of darkness, flames and screaming. While it doesn’t sound like a day at the beach, it seems that the Catholic Church has toned down its Hell in recent decades. I distinctly recall, as a young child, “borrowing” parts of Hell from my Catholic friends to complement my own Lutheran one. We put our heads together in the earnest endeavor of youth, fully convinced that Hell existed, and determined to unravel every one of its mysteries. As young children are prone to do, my Catholic friends cheerfully and explicitly provided me with many horrifying details, and they did so with ghoulish glee. I know I was impressed. These details included boiling tar (like on roofs) and Demons constantly piercing your flesh with a pitchfork so as to let in the boiling pitch. The Devil watched on with delight. To this day I can see those pitchforks and smell that tar.

(When I asked my mother to verify these details, she just scoffed at the idea, but warned me never to do anything that would enable me to find out for myself. I promised I wouldn’t, and the nightmares began.)

The Unitarian Hell is symbolic, although a spokesperson for the Unitarian position played a linguistic shell game. While claiming that the language of religion is mythology, he nevertheless insisted, in the same breath, that religion is not fantasy or fiction. Perhaps being unfamiliar with dictionaries, he wanted it both ways.

Some of Judaism and all Baptists teach Hell. For Jews it is a punishment for violating Jewish Law, and for Baptists, Hell is for anyone rejecting Jesus Christ. (Doesn’t that include the Jews?)

Finally, Hell doesn’t exist at all for traditional Creek Indians. Your reward for a good life is—a good life.

The subheading for “Visions of hell” was “Religions vary on their views about the afterlife.” I think that is a whopping understatement. “Vary” doesn’t get the job done. “Positively contradict each other” is more like it. What does it all mean? The lesson would seem to be that we should all be Creek Indians. However, the real lesson here is that while some claim that religion brings out the best in people (a most questionable proposition) it definitely brings out the worst in us. Nothing could demonstrate that more clearly than our conceptions of Hell. As Christopher Hitchens put it, “Nothing proves the man-made character of religion as obviously as the sick mind that designed hell….” Amen to that.

You have to wonder who sat down, quill pen in hand, and dreamed up these ugly, venomous torments. Whoever they were, were they drooling with salacious pleasure as they did so? It seems likely, since descriptions of Hell are unambiguous examples of pure sadism. Those of us who wish this kind of pain on others are sadistic, plain and simple. Such descriptions also validate my theory that Christians (and Muslims, for that matter) aren’t merely excited at the prospect of spending eternity with God. They are thrilled at the prospect of their enemies, real or imagined, spending eternity in Hell. Judging by some of the unabashedly violent sermons preached about Hell, this appears to be the case. It reflects an ugly aspect of human nature.

The word Hell itself is identified with the Hebrew Sheol and the Greek Hades, both referring to an underworld, the abode of the dead. It is also related to a real place south of Jerusalem that was a pit where, in the first century A.D., garbage was burned. Perhaps we can see mythology in the making? There, for all to see, was a real pit of fire, one that was foul, odious and generally disgusting. It would be quite an allegory in trying to frighten your children (or your congregation) into behaving. “Do you want to spend all of eternity in Hell, you fool?” The fool might ask, “But what is Hell?” The answer might be, “Well, it would be like living in, uh, that burning pit there. Forever!” It would be an attention-getter, especially if it came from a voice of authority.

However, is this what we want to be preaching today? How can we still believe in such obvious myths? And, if we do believe in Hell, why aren’t we demanding that our religious leaders get together with all other religious leaders, in some sort of worldwide conference, and hammer out a definitive agreement as to the exact nature of Hell and who is in jeopardy of ending up there? Until such a unanimous pronouncement is made, the prudent seeker of spiritual truth is in a hell of a predicament. (Sorry. Irresistible.) Do we get to choose which Hell we believe in, like a multiple choice question? May we shop for Hell? Or is it a matter of having the luck to be born into the right family? If so, that certainly isn’t fair. It means that Hell awaits the unlucky.

The religious denomination known as Religious Science teaches that we all create our own good and bad. People create their own Hell, they tell us, when they get themselves into bad situations and frames of mind. So, then, the RN who is beaten and raped as she heads for her car after her evening shift, is putting herself into a bad situation. With several broken ribs and internal hemorrhaging, she becomes addicted to the needed pain medication, and ends up an unemployed addict, hating all men and fearing all people. She certainly has put herself into a very bad frame of mind as well. Hell should await anyone witless enough to fall into such a predicament.

Islam teaches that in addition to Hell, there is also a fair amount of suffering that takes place in the grave, prior to Judgment Day. A demon will continuously crush the head of the sinner with a sledge hammer until the day of resurrection. Moreover, the sinner’s body will be slowly crushed by the narrowing of the grave. I am not making this up. Aside from the obvious biochemical factors overlooked (such as decomposition), the omission of which reflects a childlike, primitive world view, there is also a childlike nature in the type of punishment being described. Sledge hammers? Any talented 9-year-old could come up with something more imaginative than that. All you can do is shake your head and sigh.

The Jehovah’s Witnesses, smug in their knowledge of the exact number of people who will be allowed in Heaven, consider themselves “the Elect” and look down condescendingly and cruelly at the rest of humanity. From an old saying of theirs:

We are the pure and chosen few, and all the rest are damned.
There’s room enough in hell for you—we don’t want heaven crammed.

Charming! What a lovely way to look at human life. Will we ever stop this nonsense? Will the day come when we stop screaming threats at each other about some outlandish place of torture in some invisible, unknowable afterworld? When will we cease to believe in this maliciously cruel myth called Hell? When are we going to learn to appreciate our wonderful world and our all-too-brief visit here? When will love and tolerance finally dominate hate? When will….oh, the hell with it.

Sources:

Lakeland, Florida Ledger, April 21, 1996.
Hitchens, Christopher, God Is Not Great, Hachette Book Group USA, New York, 2007.